Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FTEC vs RSP: how they differ
FTEC and RSP hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and RSP hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTEC | RSP |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Corp | 1.99% | 0.38% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.60% | 0.33% |
| Sandisk Corp/DE | 0.80% | 0.32% |
| Western Digital Corp | 0.76% | 0.31% |
| Ciena Corp | 0.45% | 0.30% |
| Monolithic Power Systems Inc | 0.44% | 0.29% |
| ON Semiconductor Corp | 0.28% | 0.33% |
| Dell Technologies Inc | 0.39% | 0.27% |
| Microchip Technology Inc | 0.30% | 0.27% |
| Texas Instruments Inc | 1.20% | 0.27% |
| Lumentum Holdings Inc | 0.39% | 0.26% |
| QUALCOMM Inc | 0.92% | 0.26% |
| Only in FTEC | Only in RSP |
|---|---|
| Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.76% | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.34% |
| Marvell Technology Inc 0.75% | Centene Corp. 0.29% |
| Accenture PLC 0.53% | NXP Semiconductors N.V. 0.28% |
| NXP Semiconductors NV 0.40% | Humana Inc. 0.27% |
| Cloudflare Inc 0.35% | Nucor Corp. 0.25% |
| TE Connectivity PLC 0.34% | Comfort Systems USA, Inc. 0.25% |
| Flex Ltd 0.25% | Elevance Health, Inc. 0.25% |
| Snowflake Inc 0.23% | UnitedHealth Group Inc. 0.25% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Invesco |
| What it is | MSCI Information Technology | S&P 500 equal weight |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.7% | +14.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +18.2 pts | −2.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.20% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.2% | 99.1% |
| Holdings | 282 | 503 |
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
RSP in plain words
RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 503 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or RSP?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and RSP returned +14.8%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FTEC or RSP?
- FTEC charges 0.08% a year and RSP charges 0.20%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FTEC and RSP overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 99% of RSP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against RSP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-RSP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources