Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FTEC vs QQQM: how they differ
FTEC and QQQM hold 50% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and QQQM hold 50% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTEC | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 18.00% | 8.16% |
| Apple Inc | 14.38% | 7.29% |
| Microsoft Corp | 9.54% | 5.32% |
| Broadcom Inc | 5.01% | 3.37% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 2.64% | 4.80% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.60% | 3.70% |
| Intel Corp | 1.99% | 2.52% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 1.66% | 2.09% |
| Lam Research Corp | 1.49% | 1.75% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.45% | 1.57% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 1.40% | 1.58% |
| Texas Instruments Inc | 1.20% | 1.22% |
| Only in FTEC | Only in QQQM |
|---|---|
| Oracle Corp 1.22% | Amazon.com, Inc. 4.62% |
| International Business Machines Corp 0.99% | Alphabet Inc. 3.52% |
| Arista Networks Inc 0.89% | Tesla, Inc. 3.46% |
| Amphenol Corp 0.86% | Alphabet Inc. 3.26% |
| Salesforce Inc 0.77% | Meta Platforms, Inc. 2.97% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.76% | Walmart Inc. 2.48% |
| Corning Inc 0.68% | Costco Wholesale Corp. 1.86% |
| Accenture PLC 0.53% | Netflix, Inc. 1.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Invesco |
| What it is | MSCI Information Technology | Nasdaq-100 |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.7% | +23.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +18.2 pts | +5.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.2% | 96.7% |
| Holdings | 282 | 101 |
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
QQQM in plain words
QQQM is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or QQQM?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and QQQM returned +23.0%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FTEC or QQQM?
- FTEC charges 0.08% a year and QQQM charges 0.15%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FTEC and QQQM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 97% of QQQM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 50% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against QQQM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-QQQM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources