Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FTEC vs MTUM: how they differ
FTEC and MTUM hold 30% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and MTUM hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTEC | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc | 5.01% | 5.41% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 18.00% | 4.65% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 2.64% | 5.57% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.60% | 4.04% |
| Intel Corp | 1.99% | 3.84% |
| Lam Research Corp | 1.49% | 3.62% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.45% | 2.36% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 1.40% | 1.52% |
| KLA Corp | 1.09% | 1.61% |
| International Business Machines Corp | 0.99% | 1.20% |
| Analog Devices Inc | 0.95% | 1.02% |
| Amphenol Corp | 0.86% | 1.55% |
| Only in FTEC | Only in MTUM |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc 14.38% | JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.76% |
| Microsoft Corp 9.54% | EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 3.44% |
| Cisco Systems Inc 1.66% | CATERPILLAR INC. 3.21% |
| Oracle Corp 1.22% | ALPHABET INC. 2.95% |
| Texas Instruments Inc 1.20% | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 2.87% |
| QUALCOMM Inc 0.92% | WALMART INC. 2.76% |
| Sandisk Corp/DE 0.80% | GE VERNOVA INC. 2.54% |
| Salesforce Inc 0.77% | ALPHABET INC. 2.39% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI Information Technology | MSCI USA Momentum Factor |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.7% | +21.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +18.2 pts | +4.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.2% | 98.2% |
| Holdings | 282 | 125 |
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
MTUM in plain words
MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 125 positions, with the top ten at 40.5%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or MTUM?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and MTUM returned +21.8%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FTEC or MTUM?
- FTEC charges 0.08% a year and MTUM charges 0.15%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FTEC and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 98% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 30% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against MTUM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-MTUM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources