Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FTEC vs MAGS: how they differ
FTEC and MAGS hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and MAGS hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTEC | MAGS |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 18.00% | 4.15% |
| Apple Inc | 14.38% | 4.12% |
| Microsoft Corp | 9.54% | 3.62% |
| Only in FTEC | Only in MAGS |
|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc 5.01% | TREASURY BILL 65.41% |
| Micron Technology Inc 2.64% | Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.60% | Amazon.com Inc 4.11% |
| Intel Corp 1.99% | Tesla Inc 4.07% |
| Cisco Systems Inc 1.66% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.59% |
| Lam Research Corp 1.49% | Alphabet Inc 2.89% |
| Applied Materials Inc 1.45% | |
| Palantir Technologies Inc 1.40% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Roundhill |
| What it is | MSCI Information Technology | Magnificent Seven |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.7% | +14.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +18.2 pts | −3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.2% | 26.5% |
| Holdings | 282 | 9 |
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or MAGS?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FTEC or MAGS?
- FTEC charges 0.08% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FTEC and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 26% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources