Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FTEC vs IWF: how they differ
FTEC and IWF hold 52% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and IWF hold 52% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTEC | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 18.00% | 13.85% |
| Apple Inc | 14.38% | 6.72% |
| Broadcom Inc | 5.01% | 5.21% |
| Microsoft Corp | 9.54% | 4.11% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 2.64% | 3.86% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.60% | 2.80% |
| Lam Research Corp | 1.49% | 1.61% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.45% | 1.70% |
| KLA Corp | 1.09% | 1.17% |
| Texas Instruments Inc | 1.20% | 0.80% |
| Sandisk Corp/DE | 0.80% | 0.98% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 1.40% | 0.77% |
| Only in FTEC | Only in IWF |
|---|---|
| Intel Corp 1.99% | ALPHABET INC. 6.18% |
| Cisco Systems Inc 1.66% | ALPHABET INC. 4.98% |
| International Business Machines Corp 0.99% | TESLA, INC. 3.65% |
| QUALCOMM Inc 0.92% | META PLATFORMS, INC. 3.01% |
| Salesforce Inc 0.77% | ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 2.84% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.76% | VISA INC. 1.68% |
| Accenture PLC 0.53% | CATERPILLAR INC. 1.44% |
| Synopsys Inc 0.46% | MASTERCARD INCORPORATED 1.23% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI Information Technology | Russell 1000 growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.7% | +7.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +18.2 pts | −10.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.2% | 93.6% |
| Holdings | 282 | 368 |
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 368 positions, with the top ten at 54.4%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or IWF?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and IWF returned +7.0%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FTEC or IWF?
- FTEC charges 0.08% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FTEC and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 52% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against IWF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-IWF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources