Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FTEC vs IWD: how they differ
FTEC and IWD hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and IWD hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTEC | IWD |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 14.38% | 5.38% |
| Microsoft Corp | 9.54% | 3.89% |
| Intel Corp | 1.99% | 1.72% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 1.66% | 1.30% |
| International Business Machines Corp | 0.99% | 0.74% |
| QUALCOMM Inc | 0.92% | 0.55% |
| Analog Devices Inc | 0.95% | 0.51% |
| Salesforce Inc | 0.77% | 0.35% |
| Dell Technologies Inc | 0.39% | 0.32% |
| Synopsys Inc | 0.46% | 0.23% |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 0.26% | 0.17% |
| Coherent Corp | 0.32% | 0.15% |
| Only in FTEC | Only in IWD |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 18.00% | AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.95% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.01% | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.62% |
| Micron Technology Inc 2.64% | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 2.46% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.60% | JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.72% |
| Lam Research Corp 1.49% | EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60% |
| Applied Materials Inc 1.45% | WALMART INC. 1.28% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc 1.40% | ABBVIE INC. 1.15% |
| Oracle Corp 1.22% | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED 1.05% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI Information Technology | Russell 1000 value |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.7% | +27.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +18.2 pts | +9.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.2% | 90.2% |
| Holdings | 282 | 870 |
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IWD in plain words
IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or IWD?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and IWD returned +27.4%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FTEC or IWD?
- FTEC charges 0.08% a year and IWD charges 0.18%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FTEC and IWD overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 90% of IWD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 18% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against IWD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-IWD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources