Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FTEC vs IJH: how they differ
FTEC and IJH hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and IJH hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTEC | IJH |
|---|---|---|
| TTM Technologies Inc | 0.20% | 0.54% |
| Twilio Inc | 0.20% | 0.86% |
| Viavi Solutions Inc | 0.19% | 0.31% |
| TD SYNNEX Corp | 0.17% | 0.55% |
| Entegris Inc | 0.17% | 0.76% |
| Everpure Inc | 0.17% | 0.69% |
| MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc | 0.17% | 0.69% |
| Lattice Semiconductor Corp | 0.16% | 0.58% |
| MKS Inc | 0.16% | 0.83% |
| Onto Innovation Inc | 0.16% | 0.52% |
| Sanmina Corp | 0.16% | 0.37% |
| SiTime Corp | 0.15% | 0.46% |
| Only in FTEC | Only in IJH |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 18.00% | CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85% |
| Apple Inc 14.38% | CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77% |
| Microsoft Corp 9.54% | NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.01% | ATI INC 0.74% |
| Micron Technology Inc 2.64% | ILLUMINA INC 0.73% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.60% | TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.73% |
| Intel Corp 1.99% | STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC 0.71% |
| Cisco Systems Inc 1.66% | MASTEC INC 0.71% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI Information Technology | S&P MidCap 400 |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.7% | +13.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +18.2 pts | −4.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.05% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.2% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 282 | 400 |
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IJH in plain words
IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or IJH?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and IJH returned +13.4%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FTEC or IJH?
- FTEC charges 0.08% a year and IJH charges 0.05%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FTEC and IJH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 0% of IJH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against IJH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-IJH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources