Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FTEC vs GRNY: how they differ

FTEC and GRNY hold 17% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and GRNY hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FTEC and GRNY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFTECGRNY
Broadcom Inc5.01%2.94%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc2.60%4.17%
NVIDIA Corp18.00%2.46%
Apple Inc14.38%2.40%
Microsoft Corp9.54%2.38%
Palantir Technologies Inc1.40%2.33%
KLA Corp1.09%2.75%
Arista Networks Inc0.89%2.88%
Cadence Design Systems Inc0.45%2.54%
Strategy Inc0.22%3.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FTECOnly in GRNY
Micron Technology Inc 2.64%Quanta Services Inc 3.20%
Intel Corp 1.99%GE Vernova Inc 3.05%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.66%Amazon.com Inc 3.02%
Lam Research Corp 1.49%Alphabet Inc 2.96%
Applied Materials Inc 1.45%Netflix Inc 2.82%
Oracle Corp 1.22%Caterpillar Inc 2.69%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.20%Bank of New York Mellon Corp/T 2.59%
International Business Machines Corp 0.99%Eaton Corp PLC 2.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

FTEC and GRNY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityFundstrat
What it isMSCI Information TechnologyFundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap
Total return, 1 year+35.7%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+18.2 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.75%
Already in the S&P 50086.2%97.0%
Holdings28240

FTEC in plain words

FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or GRNY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and GRNY returned +13.8%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FTEC or GRNY?
FTEC charges 0.08% a year and GRNY charges 0.75%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FTEC and GRNY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 97% of GRNY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FTEC against GRNY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against GRNY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-GRNY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources