Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs XRT: how they differ

FNDX and XRT hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and XRT hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and XRT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXXRT
Amazon.com Inc1.86%1.35%
Walmart Inc1.01%1.27%
Costco Wholesale Corp0.53%1.29%
Target Corp0.40%1.38%
Kroger Co/The0.22%1.17%
TJX Cos Inc/The0.20%1.22%
eBay Inc0.16%1.42%
Best Buy Co Inc0.13%1.36%
Dollar General Corp0.13%1.42%
Ross Stores Inc0.10%1.24%
Dollar Tree Inc0.09%1.48%
Macy's Inc0.09%1.38%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in XRT
Apple Inc 4.64%Groupon Inc 1.78%
Intel Corp 2.57%RealReal Inc/The 1.75%
Alphabet Inc 2.38%Warby Parker Inc 1.64%
Microsoft Corp 2.33%Upbound Group Inc 1.59%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%Maplebear Inc 1.55%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%Revolve Group Inc 1.52%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%Victoria's Secret & Co 1.52%
Chevron Corp 1.49%MarineMax Inc 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FNDX and XRT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
XRT
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabState Street
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanySPDR S&P Retail
Total return, 1 year+26.1%−3.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts−20.6 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%22.5%
Holdings73375

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

XRT in plain words

XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or XRT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and XRT returned −3.0%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or XRT?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so FNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against XRT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources