Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs XLY: how they differ

FNDX and XLY hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and XLY hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and XLY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXXLY
Amazon.com Inc1.86%22.24%
General Motors Co0.74%1.73%
Ford Motor Co0.60%1.35%
Home Depot Inc/The0.52%5.83%
Tesla Inc0.34%19.66%
Lowe's Cos Inc0.33%3.08%
McDonald's Corp0.24%4.16%
TJX Cos Inc/The0.20%3.93%
Starbucks Corp0.19%2.90%
DR Horton Inc0.17%1.07%
NIKE Inc0.16%1.23%
eBay Inc0.16%1.24%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in XLY
Apple Inc 4.64%DoorDash Inc 1.74%
Intel Corp 2.57%Carvana Co 1.17%
Alphabet Inc 2.38%Garmin Ltd 0.97%
Microsoft Corp 2.33%Lululemon Athletica Inc 0.30%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd 0.24%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%Wynn Resorts Ltd 0.20%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%
Chevron Corp 1.49%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FNDX and XLY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
XLY
State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabState Street
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyConsumer discretionary
Total return, 1 year+26.1%−4.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts−21.6 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%100.0%
Holdings73347

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

XLY in plain words

XLY is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer discretionary. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 69.2%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Jan 12, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or XLY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and XLY returned −4.1%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or XLY?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and XLY charges 0.08%, so XLY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and XLY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 100% of XLY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against XLY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against XLY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-XLY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources