Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs VPU: how they differ

FNDX and VPU hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Vanguard Utilities Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and VPU hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and VPU both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXVPU
Duke Energy Corp0.25%6.31%
NextEra Energy Inc0.24%11.84%
Southern Co/The0.21%6.70%
Dominion Energy Inc0.17%3.78%
American Electric Power Co Inc0.15%4.47%
Exelon Corp0.14%3.05%
Edison International0.12%1.78%
Sempra0.12%3.85%
Consolidated Edison Inc0.10%2.52%
Xcel Energy Inc0.10%3.11%
Entergy Corp0.10%3.22%
PG&E Corp0.10%2.37%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in VPU
Apple Inc 4.64%Talen Energy Corp 0.99%
Intel Corp 2.57%IDACORP Inc 0.50%
Alphabet Inc 2.38%Ormat Technologies Inc 0.44%
Microsoft Corp 2.33%Oklo Inc 0.39%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%TXNM Energy Inc 0.38%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%New Jersey Resources Corp 0.37%
Amazon.com Inc 1.86%Black Hills Corp 0.36%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%Clearway Energy Inc 0.32%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

FNDX and VPU on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
VPU
Vanguard Utilities Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyUtilities
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+2.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts−15.4 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%90.1%
Holdings73366

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

VPU in plain words

VPU is an index equity fund tracking the Utilities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 52.7%. It sat 9.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or VPU?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and VPU returned +2.1%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or VPU?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and VPU charges 0.09%, so VPU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and VPU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 90% of VPU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against VPU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against VPU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-VPU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources