Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FNDX vs SPMO: how they differ
FNDX and SPMO hold 26% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and SPMO hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FNDX | SPMO |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Corp | 2.57% | 2.95% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.38% | 4.81% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp | 2.29% | 2.78% |
| Alphabet Inc | 1.90% | 3.81% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 1.60% | 10.72% |
| Johnson & Johnson | 0.97% | 3.85% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 0.90% | 2.02% |
| Citigroup Inc | 0.85% | 0.97% |
| Broadcom Inc | 0.65% | 7.58% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 0.60% | 2.60% |
| Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 0.58% | 1.43% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 0.55% | 8.46% |
| Only in FNDX | Only in SPMO |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc 4.64% | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.88% |
| Microsoft Corp 2.33% | Palantir Technologies Inc. 1.39% |
| Amazon.com Inc 1.86% | Comfort Systems USA, Inc. 0.47% |
| Chevron Corp 1.49% | Johnson Controls International PLC 0.42% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.41% | TE Connectivity PLC 0.31% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.38% | Robinhood Markets, Inc. 0.30% |
| UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.37% | Bunge Global S.A. 0.08% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 1.24% | Rollins, Inc. 0.06% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | Invesco |
| What it is | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | S&P 500 Momentum |
| Total return, 1 year | +26.1% | +24.5% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +8.6 pts | +7.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.13% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.2% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 733 | 99 |
FNDX in plain words
FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
SPMO in plain words
SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or SPMO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or SPMO?
- FNDX charges 0.25% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FNDX and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 26% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources