Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs SPHQ: how they differ

FNDX and SPHQ hold 16% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and SPHQ hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and SPHQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXSPHQ
Apple Inc4.64%4.51%
Cisco Systems Inc0.90%3.54%
Merck & Co Inc0.68%2.87%
Procter & Gamble Co/The0.66%3.46%
Caterpillar Inc0.60%3.78%
Costco Wholesale Corp0.53%4.82%
QUALCOMM Inc0.53%2.03%
Applied Materials Inc0.47%2.80%
Lam Research Corp0.41%4.10%
United Parcel Service Inc0.36%0.85%
Coca-Cola Co/The0.34%3.34%
Visa Inc0.33%4.69%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in SPHQ
Intel Corp 2.57%Eaton Corp. PLC 1.65%
Alphabet Inc 2.38%AppLovin Corp. 1.56%
Microsoft Corp 2.33%Trane Technologies PLC 1.30%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%Johnson Controls International PLC 1.05%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%Accenture PLC 1.04%
Amazon.com Inc 1.86%Arch Capital Group Ltd. 0.34%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%Steris PLC 0.25%
Chevron Corp 1.49%Tyler Technologies, Inc. 0.15%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FNDX and SPHQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabInvesco
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyS&P 500 Quality
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%99.9%
Holdings73399

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or SPHQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or SPHQ?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and SPHQ charges 0.15%, so SPHQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and SPHQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 100% of SPHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 16% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against SPHQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against SPHQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-SPHQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources