Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs SCHH: how they differ

FNDX and SCHH hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Schwab U.S. REIT ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and SCHH hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and SCHH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXSCHH
Prologis Inc0.12%8.97%
American Tower Corp0.10%4.35%
Weyerhaeuser Co0.08%1.25%
Crown Castle Inc0.08%2.83%
Equinix Inc0.08%4.89%
Welltower Inc0.08%9.64%
Digital Realty Trust Inc0.08%4.36%
Simon Property Group Inc0.08%4.48%
Ventas Inc0.05%2.85%
Public Storage0.05%3.41%
Equity Residential0.05%1.60%
Iron Mountain Inc0.05%2.69%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in SCHH
Apple Inc 4.64%Omega Healthcare Investors Inc 0.98%
Intel Corp 2.57%Equity LifeStyle Properties Inc 0.85%
Alphabet Inc 2.38%EastGroup Properties Inc 0.76%
Microsoft Corp 2.33%American Homes 4 Rent 0.74%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%Federal Realty Investment Trust 0.67%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%Brixmor Property Group Inc 0.67%
Amazon.com Inc 1.86%CareTrust REIT Inc 0.65%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%CubeSmart 0.65%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

FNDX and SCHH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
SCHH
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabSchwab
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyUS REIT
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+9.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts−7.7 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%74.0%
Holdings733117

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

SCHH in plain words

SCHH is an index equity fund tracking the US REIT. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 117 positions, with the top ten at 49.8%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Jul 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or SCHH?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and SCHH returned +9.8%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or SCHH?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and SCHH charges 0.07%, so SCHH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and SCHH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 74% of SCHH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against SCHH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against SCHH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-SCHH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources