Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs ONEQ: how they differ

FNDX and ONEQ hold 33% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and ONEQ hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and ONEQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXONEQ
Apple Inc4.64%10.04%
Alphabet Inc2.38%4.85%
Microsoft Corp2.33%7.32%
Alphabet Inc1.90%4.48%
Amazon.com Inc1.86%6.37%
Micron Technology Inc1.60%2.38%
Intel Corp2.57%1.25%
Meta Platforms Inc1.24%3.03%
Walmart Inc1.01%2.02%
Cisco Systems Inc0.90%1.04%
Broadcom Inc0.65%4.64%
NVIDIA Corp0.55%11.24%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in ONEQ
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC 0.78%
Chevron Corp 1.49%LINDE PLC 0.50%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.41%SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.42%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.38%APPLOVIN CORP 0.41%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.37%CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC 0.40%
Verizon Communications Inc 0.99%SHOPIFY INC 0.32%
Johnson & Johnson 0.97%ASML HOLDING NV 0.31%
CVS Health Corp 0.91%MERCADOLIBRE INC 0.19%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

FNDX and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabFidelity
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyNasdaq Composite
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+20.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts+3.1 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.21%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%87.4%
Holdings7331022

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or ONEQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or ONEQ?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 33% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against ONEQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources