Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FNDX vs KRE: how they differ
FNDX and KRE hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and KRE hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FNDX | KRE |
|---|---|---|
| Truist Financial Corp | 0.19% | 1.27% |
| Citizens Financial Group Inc | 0.08% | 1.37% |
| M&T Bank Corp | 0.07% | 1.35% |
| Regions Financial Corp | 0.07% | 1.34% |
| Huntington Bancshares Inc/OH | 0.06% | 1.33% |
| Zions Bancorp NA | 0.04% | 1.33% |
| East West Bancorp Inc | 0.03% | 1.28% |
| First Horizon Corp | 0.03% | 1.31% |
| Webster Financial Corp | 0.02% | 1.35% |
| Flagstar Bank NA | 0.01% | 1.31% |
| Popular Inc | 0.01% | 1.33% |
| Only in FNDX | Only in KRE |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc 4.64% | Pinnacle Financial Partners Inc 1.37% |
| Intel Corp 2.57% | Atlantic Union Bankshares Corp 1.37% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.38% | UMB Financial Corp 1.37% |
| Microsoft Corp 2.33% | Glacier Bancorp Inc 1.36% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29% | Associated Banc-Corp 1.36% |
| Alphabet Inc 1.90% | Cullen/Frost Bankers Inc 1.35% |
| Amazon.com Inc 1.86% | First Interstate BancSystem Inc 1.35% |
| Micron Technology Inc 1.60% | Fulton Financial Corp 1.35% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | KRE State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | State Street |
| What it is | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | SPDR S&P Regional Banking |
| Total return, 1 year | +26.1% | +16.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +8.6 pts | −1.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.2% | 6.7% |
| Holdings | 733 | 161 |
FNDX in plain words
FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
KRE in plain words
KRE is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 161 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or KRE?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and KRE returned +16.1%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or KRE?
- FNDX charges 0.25% a year and KRE charges 0.35%, so FNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FNDX and KRE overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 7% of KRE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against KRE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-KRE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources