Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs ITOT: how they differ

FNDX and ITOT hold 61% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and ITOT hold 61% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and ITOT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXITOT
Apple Inc4.64%5.82%
Alphabet Inc2.38%2.87%
Microsoft Corp2.33%3.80%
Alphabet Inc1.90%2.29%
Amazon.com Inc1.86%3.20%
Micron Technology Inc1.60%1.78%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc1.41%1.26%
Meta Platforms Inc1.24%1.70%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.38%1.20%
Intel Corp2.57%0.90%
Johnson & Johnson0.97%0.84%
Exxon Mobil Corp2.29%0.78%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in ITOT
Linde PLC 0.29%Palantir Technologies, Inc. 0.37%
Honeywell International Inc 0.29%Linde plc 0.33%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.29%Seagate Technology Holdings plc 0.30%
Accenture PLC 0.26%Crowdstrike Holdings, Inc. 0.27%
Chubb Ltd 0.18%Eaton Corp. plc 0.23%
CRH PLC 0.17%AppLovin Corp. 0.19%
Eaton Corp PLC 0.15%Chubb Ltd. 0.17%
Flex Ltd 0.14%Trane Technologies plc 0.15%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FNDX and ITOT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabiShares
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyCore S&P Total U.S. Stock Market
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%88.3%
Holdings7332497

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or ITOT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and ITOT returned +17.2%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or ITOT?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and ITOT charges 0.03%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and ITOT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 88% of ITOT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 61% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against ITOT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against ITOT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-ITOT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources