Which returned more over the last year, FLKR or MUB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLKR returned +146.0% and MUB returned +0.1%, so FLKR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FLKR or MUB?

FLKR charges 0.09% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FLKR vs MUB: how they differ

FLKR and MUB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FLKR returned more over the year.

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF and iShares National Muni Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FLKR and MUB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FLKR	Only in MUB
SK HYNIX INC 23.85%	Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 15.68%	New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 13.10%	New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%
SK SQUARE CO LTD 3.75%	Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS 3.64%	Northwest Independent School District 0.13%
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 2.14%	Ohio State University (The) 0.13%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC 1.75%	State of New Jersey 0.13%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 1.73%	State of California 0.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FLKR and MUB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Franklin	iShares
What it is	FTSE South Korea	National Muni Bond
Total return, 1 year	+146.0%	+0.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+128.5 pts	−17.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.09%	0.05%
Holdings	157	6603

FLKR in plain words

FLKR is an index equity fund tracking the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +146.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 157 positions, with the top ten at 68.2%. It sat 13.6% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLKR or MUB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLKR returned +146.0% and MUB returned +0.1%, so FLKR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FLKR or MUB?: FLKR charges 0.09% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FLKR against MUB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FLKR against MUB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FLKR-MUB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources