Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FLKR vs MAGS: how they differ

FLKR and MAGS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FLKR returned more over the year.

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FLKR and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FLKROnly in MAGS
SK HYNIX INC 23.85%TREASURY BILL 65.41%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 15.68%Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 13.10%NVIDIA Corp 4.15%
SK SQUARE CO LTD 3.75%Apple Inc 4.12%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS 3.64%Amazon.com Inc 4.11%
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 2.14%Tesla Inc 4.07%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC 1.75%Microsoft Corp 3.62%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 1.73%Meta Platforms Inc 3.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

FLKR and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFranklinRoundhill
What it isFTSE South KoreaMagnificent Seven
Total return, 1 year+146.0%+14.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+128.5 pts−3.1 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.30%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%26.5%
Holdings1579

FLKR in plain words

FLKR is an index equity fund tracking the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +146.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 157 positions, with the top ten at 68.2%. It sat 13.6% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLKR or MAGS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLKR returned +146.0% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so FLKR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FLKR or MAGS?
FLKR charges 0.09% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so FLKR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FLKR and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FLKR and 26% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FLKR against MAGS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FLKR against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FLKR-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources