Which returned more over the last year, FLKR or IGIB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLKR returned +146.0% and IGIB returned −1.0%, so FLKR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FLKR or IGIB?

FLKR charges 0.09% a year and IGIB charges 0.04%, so IGIB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FLKR vs IGIB: how they differ

FLKR and IGIB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FLKR returned more over the year.

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF and iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FLKR and IGIB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FLKR	Only in IGIB
SK HYNIX INC 23.85%	META PLATFORMS INC 0.24%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 15.68%	AMAZON.COM INC 0.23%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 13.10%	ANHEUSER-BUSCH CO/INBEV 0.20%
SK SQUARE CO LTD 3.75%	BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.20%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS 3.64%	BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.20%
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 2.14%	BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.20%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC 1.75%	MARS INC 0.19%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 1.73%	PFIZER INVESTMENT ENTER 0.19%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FLKR and IGIB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	IGIB iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Franklin	iShares
What it is	FTSE South Korea	5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+146.0%	−1.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+128.5 pts	−18.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.09%	0.04%
Holdings	157	2988

FLKR in plain words

FLKR is an index equity fund tracking the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +146.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 157 positions, with the top ten at 68.2%. It sat 13.6% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IGIB in plain words

IGIB is a bond fund tracking the 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLKR or IGIB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLKR returned +146.0% and IGIB returned −1.0%, so FLKR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FLKR or IGIB?: FLKR charges 0.09% a year and IGIB charges 0.04%, so IGIB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FLKR against IGIB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FLKR against IGIB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FLKR-IGIB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources