Which returned more over the last year, FENI or PULS?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FENI returned +19.4% and PULS returned +4.2%, so FENI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FENI or PULS?

FENI charges 0.28% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FENI vs PULS: how they differ

FENI and PULS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FENI returned more over the year.

Fidelity Enhanced International ETF and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FENI and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FENI	Only in PULS
ASML HOLDING NV 4.11%	PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%
NESTLE SA 1.77%	GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%
SIEMENS AG 1.63%	Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%
TOKYO ELECTRON LTD 1.46%	ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%
ABB LTD 1.34%	BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.33%	FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%
IBERDROLA SA 1.23%	BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%
BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA S.A 1.22%	BROADCOM INC 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 29, 2026.

FENI and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FENI Fidelity Enhanced International ETF	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Fidelity	PGIM
What it is	Enhanced International	PGIM Ultra Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+19.4%	+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+1.9 pts	−13.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.28%	0.15%
Holdings	392	553

FENI in plain words

FENI is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced International. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 392 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%.

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FENI or PULS?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FENI returned +19.4% and PULS returned +4.2%, so FENI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FENI or PULS?: FENI charges 0.28% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FENI against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FENI against PULS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FENI-PULS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources