Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FENI vs MAGS: how they differ
FENI and MAGS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FENI returned more over the year.
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FENI and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FENI | Only in MAGS |
|---|---|
| ASML HOLDING NV 4.11% | TREASURY BILL 65.41% |
| NESTLE SA 1.77% | Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% |
| SIEMENS AG 1.63% | NVIDIA Corp 4.15% |
| TOKYO ELECTRON LTD 1.46% | Apple Inc 4.12% |
| ABB LTD 1.34% | Amazon.com Inc 4.11% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.33% | Tesla Inc 4.07% |
| IBERDROLA SA 1.23% | Microsoft Corp 3.62% |
| BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA S.A 1.22% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| FENI Fidelity Enhanced International ETF | MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Roundhill |
| What it is | Enhanced International | Magnificent Seven |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.4% | +14.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.9 pts | −3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 26.5% |
| Holdings | 392 | 9 |
FENI in plain words
FENI is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced International. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 392 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%.
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FENI or MAGS?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FENI returned +19.4% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so FENI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FENI or MAGS?
- FENI charges 0.28% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so FENI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FENI and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FENI and 26% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FENI against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FENI-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources