Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FENI vs IWC: how they differ
FENI and IWC are both equity index funds, and over the year IWC returned more, +31.3% against +19.4%.
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF and iShares Micro-Cap ETF.
| FENI Fidelity Enhanced International ETF | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | Enhanced International | Russell Microcap |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.4% | +31.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.9 pts | +13.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | not published |
| Holdings | 392 | not filed |
FENI in plain words
FENI is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced International. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 392 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%.
IWC in plain words
IWC is an index equity fund tracking the Russell Microcap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FENI or IWC?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FENI returned +19.4% and IWC returned +31.3%, so IWC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FENI against IWC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FENI-IWC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources