Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FENI vs IDEV: how they differ

FENI and IDEV hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and FENI returned more over the year.

Fidelity Enhanced International ETF and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FENI and IDEV hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FENI and IDEV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFENIIDEV
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC1.33%1.09%
SHELL PLC1.00%0.90%
ASTRAZENECA PLC0.82%1.02%
TOTALENERGIES SE0.65%0.64%
ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC1.09%0.47%
SAFRAN SA0.57%0.40%
INTESA SANPAOLO SPA0.95%0.33%
NATIONAL GRID PLC0.30%0.30%
BAE SYSTEMS PLC0.51%0.29%
LLOYDS BANKING GROUP PLC0.95%0.27%
SAP SE0.24%0.61%
GSK PLC0.24%0.37%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FENIOnly in IDEV
ASML HOLDING NV 4.11%ASML Holding N.V. 1.95%
NESTLE SA 1.77%Novartis AG 0.97%
SIEMENS AG 1.63%Nestle S.A. 0.90%
TOKYO ELECTRON LTD 1.46%ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.87%
ABB LTD 1.34%Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 0.78%
IBERDROLA SA 1.23%COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 0.73%
BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA S.A 1.22%Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. 0.71%
UBS GROUP AG 1.22%BHP GROUP LIMITED 0.70%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FENI and IDEV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FENI
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityiShares
What it isEnhanced InternationalCore MSCI International Developed Markets
Total return, 1 year+19.4%+18.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.9 pts+1.2 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.04%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.1%
Holdings3922268

FENI in plain words

FENI is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced International. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 392 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%.

IDEV in plain words

IDEV is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI International Developed Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2268 positions, with the top ten at 10.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FENI or IDEV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FENI returned +19.4% and IDEV returned +18.7%, so FENI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FENI or IDEV?
FENI charges 0.28% a year and IDEV charges 0.04%, so IDEV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FENI and IDEV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FENI and 0% of IDEV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FENI against IDEV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FENI against IDEV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FENI-IDEV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources