Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or XOP?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and XOP returned +52.4%, so XOP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FDVV or XOP?

FDVV charges 0.15% a year and XOP charges 0.35%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs XOP: how they differ

FDVV and XOP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XOP returned more over the year.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and XOP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FDVV	Only in XOP
NVIDIA CORP 6.86%	Texas Pacific Land Corp 3.17%
APPLE INC 5.70%	PBF Energy Inc 2.91%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.50%	Delek US Holdings Inc 2.81%
BROADCOM INC 3.50%	Expand Energy Corp 2.80%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58%	CNX Resources Corp 2.78%
ALPHABET INC 2.21%	EQT Corp 2.75%
COCA COLA CO 1.85%	Valero Energy Corp 2.75%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81%	Antero Resources Corp 2.68%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FDVV and XOP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	XOP State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Fidelity	State Street
What it is	High Dividend	SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Total return, 1 year	+17.2%	+52.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.3 pts	+34.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.35%
Holdings	96	51

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

XOP in plain words

XOP is a commodity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +52.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 26.8% below its high of Jun 23, 2014 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or XOP?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and XOP returned +52.4%, so XOP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or XOP?: FDVV charges 0.15% a year and XOP charges 0.35%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against XOP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against XOP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-XOP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources