Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs SPMO: how they differ

FDVV and SPMO hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and SPMO hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FDVV and SPMO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFDVVSPMO
NVIDIA CORP6.86%8.46%
BROADCOM INC3.50%7.58%
ALPHABET INC2.21%4.81%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE)1.71%1.43%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC1.64%1.29%
COCA COLA CO1.85%1.21%
JOHNSON and JOHNSON0.49%3.85%
ALTRIA GROUP INC1.70%0.47%
CATERPILLAR INC0.46%2.60%
GE AEROSPACE0.34%1.63%
FORD MOTOR CO1.26%0.30%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER CO INC1.24%0.30%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FDVVOnly in SPMO
APPLE INC 5.70%Micron Technology, Inc. 10.72%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.50%Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.14%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58%Alphabet Inc. 3.81%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81%Lam Research Corp. 3.54%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.78%Intel Corp. 2.95%
HOME DEPOT INC 1.66%Exxon Mobil Corp. 2.78%
STARBUCKS CORP 1.66%Sandisk Corp. 2.46%
TJX COMPANIES INC 1.65%Cisco Systems, Inc. 2.02%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FDVV and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityInvesco
What it isHigh DividendS&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+24.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts+7.0 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.13%
Already in the S&P 50086.7%100.0%
Holdings9699

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or SPMO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or SPMO?
FDVV charges 0.15% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FDVV and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 19% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against SPMO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources