Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs SDY: how they differ

FDVV and SDY hold 17% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and SDY hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FDVV and SDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFDVVSDY
PEPSICO INC1.63%1.33%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC.1.32%1.56%
COCA COLA CO1.85%1.26%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO1.81%1.26%
SOUTHERN COMPANY1.22%1.33%
EDISON INTERNATIONAL1.12%1.45%
NEXTERA ENERGY INC1.39%1.08%
EVERSOURCE ENERGY1.06%1.35%
NIKE INC1.02%1.15%
IBM CORPORATION0.90%1.27%
REALTY INCOME CORP0.90%2.14%
MCDONALDS CORP1.55%0.89%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FDVVOnly in SDY
NVIDIA CORP 6.86%Kenvue Inc 1.76%
APPLE INC 5.70%Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.75%
BROADCOM INC 3.50%QUALCOMM Inc 1.57%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58%Target Corp 1.55%
ALPHABET INC 2.21%Sysco Corp 1.41%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.78%WEC Energy Group Inc 1.41%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE) 1.71%Consolidated Edison Inc 1.34%
ALTRIA GROUP INC 1.70%Microchip Technology Inc 1.32%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FDVV and SDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityState Street
What it isHigh DividendSPDR S&P Dividend
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+11.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts−6.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50086.7%84.6%
Holdings96155

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or SDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and SDY returned +11.0%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or SDY?
FDVV charges 0.15% a year and SDY charges 0.35%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FDVV and SDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 85% of SDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against SDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against SDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-SDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources