Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs MINT: how they differ

FDVV and MINT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and MINT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FDVVOnly in MINT
NVIDIA CORP 6.86%United States Treasury 6.51%
APPLE INC 5.70%Fannie Mae 1.18%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.50%Freddie Mac 1.04%
BROADCOM INC 3.50%SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.91%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58%HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.81%
ALPHABET INC 2.21%AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.81%
COCA COLA CO 1.85%Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.75%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81%INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FDVV and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityPIMCO
What it isHigh DividendEnhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+4.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts−13.1 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.36%
Already in the S&P 50086.7%9.7%
Holdings96977

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

MINT in plain words

MINT is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 977 positions, with the top ten at 14.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or MINT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and MINT returned +4.4%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or MINT?
FDVV charges 0.15% a year and MINT charges 0.36%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FDVV and MINT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 10% of MINT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against MINT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against MINT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-MINT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources