Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FBCG vs XLI: how they differ
FBCG and XLI hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and XLI hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FBCG | XLI |
|---|---|---|
| GE VERNOVA INC | 0.82% | 5.48% |
| BOEING CO | 0.63% | 2.96% |
| GE AEROSPACE | 0.40% | 6.77% |
| HOWMET AEROSPACE INC | 0.36% | 1.87% |
| DELTA AIR LINES INC | 0.33% | 1.06% |
| COMFORT SYSTEMS USA INC | 0.30% | 1.21% |
| UNITED AIRLINES HOLDINGS INC | 0.30% | 0.77% |
| UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC | 0.21% | 2.55% |
| CUMMINS INC | 0.20% | 1.71% |
| CATERPILLAR INC | 0.16% | 8.52% |
| AXON ENTERPRISE INC | 0.12% | 0.79% |
| OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINES INC | 0.12% | 0.69% |
| Only in FBCG | Only in XLI |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 14.62% | RTX Corp 4.44% |
| APPLE INC 9.64% | Eaton Corp PLC 2.87% |
| ALPHABET INC 9.10% | Union Pacific Corp 2.81% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 8.43% | Deere & Co 2.77% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.20% | Vertiv Holdings Co 2.23% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 3.90% | Parker-Hannifin Corp 2.14% |
| BROADCOM INC 3.74% | Trane Technologies PLC 1.89% |
| ELI LILLY and CO 2.25% | Quanta Services Inc 1.88% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | XLI State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | State Street |
| What it is | Blue Chip Growth | Industrials |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.3% | +14.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.2 pts | −3.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.8% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 214 | 81 |
FBCG in plain words
FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLI in plain words
XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 41.4%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or XLI?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and XLI returned +14.3%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FBCG or XLI?
- FBCG charges 0.57% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so XLI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FBCG and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against XLI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-XLI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources