Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or VUSB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and VUSB returned +3.7%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FBCG or VUSB?

FBCG charges 0.57% a year and VUSB charges 0.10%, so VUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs VUSB: how they differ

FBCG and VUSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and VUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCG	Only in VUSB
NVIDIA CORP 14.62%	United States Treasury Bill 4.24%
APPLE INC 9.64%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.68%
ALPHABET INC 9.10%	PNC Financial Services Group Inc/The 0.59%
AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.53%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%	Regions Bank/Birmingham AL 0.52%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%	US Bancorp 0.51%
BROADCOM INC 3.74%	Charles Schwab Corp/The 0.50%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%	Truist Bank 0.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FBCG and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Fidelity	Vanguard
What it is	Blue Chip Growth	Ultra-Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+17.3%	+3.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.2 pts	−13.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.57%	0.10%
Holdings	214	1281

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VUSB in plain words

VUSB is a cash and treasury bills tracking the Ultra-Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or VUSB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and VUSB returned +3.7%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or VUSB?: FBCG charges 0.57% a year and VUSB charges 0.10%, so VUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against VUSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against VUSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-VUSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources