Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs VTV: how they differ

FBCG and VTV hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and VTV returned more over the year.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and VTV hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FBCG and VTV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFBCGVTV
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC0.82%4.89%
GILEAD SCIENCES INC0.69%0.59%
LOWES COS INC0.48%0.47%
ABBVIE INC0.42%1.67%
GE AEROSPACE0.40%0.73%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE)0.23%1.07%
CORNING INC0.23%0.37%
JOHNSON and JOHNSON0.23%2.30%
TARGET CORP0.42%0.22%
DELTA AIR LINES INC0.33%0.22%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC0.21%0.28%
CARDINAL HEALTH INC0.20%0.21%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCGOnly in VTV
NVIDIA CORP 14.62%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.07%
APPLE INC 9.64%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.96%
ALPHABET INC 9.10%Walmart Inc 1.87%
AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%Cisco Systems Inc 1.57%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%Bank of America Corp 1.37%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%Merck & Co Inc 1.19%
BROADCOM INC 3.74%Philip Morris International Inc 1.06%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%Intel Corp 1.05%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FBCG and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
VTV
Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityVanguard
What it isBlue Chip GrowthUS value
Total return, 1 year+17.3%+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.2 pts+5.4 pts
Expense ratio0.57%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50086.8%98.6%
Holdings214308

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTV in plain words

VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or VTV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and VTV returned +22.9%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or VTV?
FBCG charges 0.57% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against VTV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against VTV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-VTV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources