Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FBCG vs VONG: how they differ
FBCG and VONG hold 59% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and VONG hold 59% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FBCG | VONG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 14.62% | 13.09% |
| APPLE INC | 9.64% | 11.97% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 5.20% | 8.98% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 8.43% | 5.07% |
| ALPHABET INC | 9.10% | 3.91% |
| BROADCOM INC | 3.74% | 5.78% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 3.90% | 3.20% |
| ELI LILLY and CO | 2.25% | 2.67% |
| TESLA INC | 1.45% | 3.48% |
| NETFLIX INC | 2.23% | 1.10% |
| MASTERCARD INC | 0.81% | 1.20% |
| GE VERNOVA INC | 0.82% | 0.79% |
| Only in FBCG | Only in VONG |
|---|---|
| WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 1.19% | Alphabet Inc 3.15% |
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.12% | Palo Alto Networks Inc 0.68% |
| CELESTICA INC 0.88% | Coca-Cola Co/The 0.45% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 0.82% | Intuitive Surgical Inc 0.45% |
| SANDISK CORP/DE 0.82% | Amgen Inc 0.40% |
| SHARKNINJA INC 0.67% | Booking Holdings Inc 0.39% |
| WELLTOWER INC 0.58% | Vertiv Holdings Co 0.36% |
| FTAI AVIATION LTD 0.49% | Texas Instruments Inc 0.34% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Vanguard |
| What it is | Blue Chip Growth | Russell 1000 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.3% | +7.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.2 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.8% | 95.6% |
| Holdings | 214 | 387 |
FBCG in plain words
FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VONG in plain words
VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or VONG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and VONG returned +7.2%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FBCG or VONG?
- FBCG charges 0.57% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FBCG and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 59% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources