Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FBCG vs VGT: how they differ
FBCG and VGT hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and VGT returned more over the year.
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and VGT hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FBCG | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 14.62% | 16.85% |
| APPLE INC | 9.64% | 14.59% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 5.20% | 9.47% |
| BROADCOM INC | 3.74% | 4.21% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 0.82% | 4.21% |
| SANDISK CORP/DE | 0.82% | 0.98% |
| WESTERN DIGITAL CORP | 1.19% | 0.76% |
| MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC | 2.03% | 0.73% |
| APPLOVIN CORP | 1.26% | 0.58% |
| ORACLE CORP | 0.49% | 1.46% |
| AMPHENOL CORPORATION NEW | 0.38% | 0.73% |
| PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC | 0.37% | 1.35% |
| Only in FBCG | Only in VGT |
|---|---|
| ALPHABET INC 9.10% | Intel Corp 2.03% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 8.43% | Cisco Systems Inc 1.85% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 3.90% | Applied Materials Inc 1.40% |
| ELI LILLY and CO 2.25% | Texas Instruments Inc 1.11% |
| NETFLIX INC 2.23% | QUALCOMM Inc 1.09% |
| TESLA INC 1.45% | International Business Machines Corp 1.08% |
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.12% | Palo Alto Networks Inc 0.92% |
| CELESTICA INC 0.88% | Analog Devices Inc 0.82% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | VGT Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Vanguard |
| What it is | Blue Chip Growth | Information technology |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.3% | +35.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.2 pts | +17.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.09% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.8% | 86.9% |
| Holdings | 214 | 317 |
FBCG in plain words
FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VGT in plain words
VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or VGT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and VGT returned +35.4%, so VGT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FBCG or VGT?
- FBCG charges 0.57% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so VGT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FBCG and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 42% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against VGT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-VGT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources