Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or VCLT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FBCG or VCLT?

FBCG charges 0.57% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs VCLT: how they differ

FBCG and VCLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and VCLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCG	Only in VCLT
NVIDIA CORP 14.62%	Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch 0.38%
APPLE INC 9.64%	CVS Health Corp 0.34%
ALPHABET INC 9.10%	Meta Platforms Inc 0.29%
AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%	Boeing Co/The 0.27%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%	Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.27%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%	Amazon.com Inc 0.26%
BROADCOM INC 3.74%	Oracle Corp 0.24%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%	AT&T Inc 0.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FBCG and VCLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Fidelity	Vanguard
What it is	Blue Chip Growth	Long-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+17.3%	−4.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.2 pts	−22.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.57%	0.03%
Holdings	214	2775

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VCLT in plain words

VCLT is a bond fund tracking the Long-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 18.1% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or VCLT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or VCLT?: FBCG charges 0.57% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against VCLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against VCLT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-VCLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources