Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs VBR: how they differ

FBCG and VBR hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and VBR hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FBCG and VBR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFBCGVBR
NRG ENERGY INC0.18%0.66%
JABIL INC0.16%0.87%
VICTORIA'S SECRET and CO0.20%0.14%
ECHOSTAR CORP0.12%0.15%
REGAL REXNORD CORP0.10%0.34%
SNAP INC0.31%0.10%
TD SYNNEX CORP0.10%0.41%
TAPESTRY INC0.10%0.64%
BJS WHOLESALE CLUB HOLDINGS INC0.08%0.24%
LYFT INC0.08%0.11%
URBAN OUTFITTERS0.07%0.09%
MODERNA INC0.07%0.54%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCGOnly in VBR
NVIDIA CORP 14.62%Atmos Energy Corp 0.62%
APPLE INC 9.64%Williams-Sonoma Inc 0.59%
ALPHABET INC 9.10%Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52%
AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%F5 Inc 0.50%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%US Foods Holding Corp 0.48%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%JB Hunt Transport Services Inc 0.47%
BROADCOM INC 3.74%Expand Energy Corp 0.47%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%CH Robinson Worldwide Inc 0.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FBCG and VBR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityVanguard
What it isBlue Chip GrowthSmall-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+17.3%+16.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.2 pts−1.2 pts
Expense ratio0.57%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50086.8%30.5%
Holdings214840

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VBR in plain words

VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or VBR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and VBR returned +16.3%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or VBR?
FBCG charges 0.57% a year and VBR charges 0.05%, so VBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and VBR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 30% of VBR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against VBR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against VBR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-VBR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources