Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FBCG vs SPYG: how they differ
FBCG and SPYG hold 58% of their weight in the same names, and SPYG returned more over the year.
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and SPYG hold 58% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FBCG | SPYG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 14.62% | 13.66% |
| APPLE INC | 9.64% | 5.99% |
| ALPHABET INC | 9.10% | 5.91% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 5.20% | 7.81% |
| BROADCOM INC | 3.74% | 5.04% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 3.90% | 3.49% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 8.43% | 3.48% |
| ELI LILLY and CO | 2.25% | 2.67% |
| TESLA INC | 1.45% | 2.07% |
| NETFLIX INC | 2.23% | 0.85% |
| GE VERNOVA INC | 0.82% | 0.89% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 0.82% | 3.67% |
| Only in FBCG | Only in SPYG |
|---|---|
| WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 1.19% | Alphabet Inc 4.71% |
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.12% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.58% |
| CELESTICA INC 0.88% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.68% |
| SHARKNINJA INC 0.67% | Applied Materials Inc 1.62% |
| STARBUCKS CORP 0.61% | RTX Corp 0.72% |
| ASTERA LABS INC 0.54% | Cisco Systems Inc 0.69% |
| FTAI AVIATION LTD 0.49% | Philip Morris International Inc 0.45% |
| LOWES COS INC 0.48% | Palo Alto Networks Inc 0.44% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | SPYG State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | State Street |
| What it is | Blue Chip Growth | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.3% | +17.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.2 pts | +0.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.8% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 214 | 147 |
FBCG in plain words
FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPYG in plain words
SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or SPYG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FBCG or SPYG?
- FBCG charges 0.57% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FBCG and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 58% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against SPYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-SPYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources