Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs SPYD: how they differ

FBCG and SPYD hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and SPYD hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FBCG and SPYD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFBCGSPYD
TARGET CORP0.42%1.48%
CHEVRON CORP NEW0.11%1.20%
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP0.09%1.32%
PEPSICO INC0.09%1.11%
VIATRIS INC0.01%1.46%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCGOnly in SPYD
NVIDIA CORP 14.62%Iron Mountain Inc 1.62%
APPLE INC 9.64%Franklin Resources Inc 1.57%
ALPHABET INC 9.10%CVS Health Corp 1.53%
AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%Host Hotels & Resorts Inc 1.53%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%Edison International 1.48%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%APA Corp 1.48%
BROADCOM INC 3.74%Kimco Realty Corp 1.46%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%Simon Property Group Inc 1.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FBCG and SPYD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
SPYD
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityState Street
What it isBlue Chip GrowthSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend
Total return, 1 year+17.3%+12.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.2 pts−4.6 pts
Expense ratio0.57%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50086.8%100.0%
Holdings21478

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPYD in plain words

SPYD is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 15.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or SPYD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and SPYD returned +12.9%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or SPYD?
FBCG charges 0.57% a year and SPYD charges 0.07%, so SPYD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and SPYD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 100% of SPYD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against SPYD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against SPYD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-SPYD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources