Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or PULS?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and PULS returned +4.2%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FBCG or PULS?

FBCG charges 0.57% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs PULS: how they differ

FBCG and PULS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCG	Only in PULS
NVIDIA CORP 14.62%	PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%
APPLE INC 9.64%	GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%
ALPHABET INC 9.10%	Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%
AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%	ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%	BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%	FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%
BROADCOM INC 3.74%	BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%	BROADCOM INC 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 29, 2026.

FBCG and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Fidelity	PGIM
What it is	Blue Chip Growth	PGIM Ultra Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+17.3%	+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.2 pts	−13.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.57%	0.15%
Holdings	214	553

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or PULS?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and PULS returned +4.2%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or PULS?: FBCG charges 0.57% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against PULS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-PULS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources