Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs MGK: how they differ

FBCG and MGK hold 61% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and MGK hold 61% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FBCG and MGK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFBCGMGK
NVIDIA CORP14.62%13.29%
APPLE INC9.64%12.19%
ALPHABET INC9.10%5.93%
MICROSOFT CORP5.20%7.52%
AMAZON.COM INC8.43%4.47%
META PLATFORMS INC3.90%4.08%
BROADCOM INC3.74%4.28%
ELI LILLY and CO2.25%3.41%
TESLA INC1.45%3.93%
NETFLIX INC2.23%1.12%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC2.03%1.03%
GE VERNOVA INC0.82%1.21%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCGOnly in MGK
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.12%Alphabet Inc 4.67%
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC 1.03%Applied Materials Inc 1.13%
CELESTICA INC 0.88%Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.10%
LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC 0.82%Intel Corp 1.10%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 0.82%Booking Holdings Inc 0.63%
GILEAD SCIENCES INC 0.69%Intuitive Surgical Inc 0.63%
SHARKNINJA INC 0.67%Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.60%
STARBUCKS CORP 0.61%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FBCG and MGK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityVanguard
What it isBlue Chip GrowthMega Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+17.3%+14.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.2 pts−2.6 pts
Expense ratio0.57%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50086.8%99.2%
Holdings21456

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MGK in plain words

MGK is an index equity fund tracking the Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 56 positions, with the top ten at 63.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or MGK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and MGK returned +14.9%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or MGK?
FBCG charges 0.57% a year and MGK charges 0.07%, so MGK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and MGK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 99% of MGK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 61% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against MGK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against MGK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-MGK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources