Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs MDY: how they differ

FBCG and MDY hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and MDY hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FBCG and MDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFBCGMDY
TWILIO INC0.38%0.86%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP0.23%0.85%
MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS INC0.16%0.69%
NEXTPOWER INC0.15%0.49%
WINGSTOP INC0.12%0.13%
TEXAS ROADHOUSE INC0.11%0.35%
CELSIUS HOLDINGS INC0.10%0.13%
RBC BEARINGS INC0.10%0.56%
REGAL REXNORD CORP0.10%0.44%
XPO INC0.10%0.67%
TD SYNNEX CORP0.10%0.55%
FIVE BELOW INC0.10%0.27%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCGOnly in MDY
NVIDIA CORP 14.62%MKS INC 0.83%
APPLE INC 9.64%CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77%
ALPHABET INC 9.10%ENTEGRIS INC 0.76%
AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%ILLUMINA INC 0.73%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.73%
BROADCOM INC 3.74%STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC 0.71%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%MASTEC INC 0.71%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FBCG and MDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityState Street
What it isBlue Chip GrowthS&P MidCap 400, book from IJH
Total return, 1 year+17.3%+13.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.2 pts−4.5 pts
Expense ratio0.57%0.23%
Already in the S&P 50086.8%0.0%
Holdings214400

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MDY in plain words

MDY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or MDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and MDY returned +13.0%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or MDY?
FBCG charges 0.57% a year and MDY charges 0.23%, so MDY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and MDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 0% of MDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against MDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against MDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-MDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources