Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FBCG vs MAGS: how they differ
FBCG and MAGS hold 24% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and MAGS hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FBCG | MAGS |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 14.62% | 4.15% |
| APPLE INC | 9.64% | 4.12% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 8.43% | 4.11% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 5.20% | 3.62% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 3.90% | 3.59% |
| ALPHABET INC | 9.10% | 2.89% |
| TESLA INC | 1.45% | 4.07% |
| Only in FBCG | Only in MAGS |
|---|---|
| BROADCOM INC 3.74% | TREASURY BILL 65.41% |
| ELI LILLY and CO 2.25% | Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% |
| NETFLIX INC 2.23% | |
| MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 2.03% | |
| APPLOVIN CORP 1.26% | |
| WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 1.19% | |
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.12% | |
| MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC 1.03% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Roundhill |
| What it is | Blue Chip Growth | Magnificent Seven |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.3% | +14.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.2 pts | −3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.8% | 26.5% |
| Holdings | 214 | 9 |
FBCG in plain words
FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or MAGS?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FBCG or MAGS?
- FBCG charges 0.57% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so MAGS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FBCG and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 26% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 24% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources