Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or IUSB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and IUSB returned −0.3%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FBCG or IUSB?

FBCG charges 0.57% a year and IUSB charges 0.06%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs IUSB: how they differ

FBCG and IUSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and IUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCG	Only in IUSB
NVIDIA CORP 14.62%	United States of America 0.38%
APPLE INC 9.64%	United States of America 0.37%
ALPHABET INC 9.10%	United States of America 0.37%
AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%	United States of America 0.37%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%	United States of America 0.36%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%	United States of America 0.36%
BROADCOM INC 3.74%	United States of America 0.36%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%	United States of America 0.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

FBCG and IUSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Fidelity	iShares
What it is	Blue Chip Growth	Core Universal USD Bond
Total return, 1 year	+17.3%	−0.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.2 pts	−17.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.57%	0.06%
Holdings	214	17819

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IUSB in plain words

IUSB is a bond fund tracking the Core Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or IUSB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and IUSB returned −0.3%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or IUSB?: FBCG charges 0.57% a year and IUSB charges 0.06%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against IUSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against IUSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-IUSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources