Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs IJT: how they differ

FBCG and IJT hold 1% of their weight in the same names.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and IJT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FBCG and IJT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFBCGIJT
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC0.29%0.80%
CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY0.09%0.17%
WARBY PARKER INC0.08%0.21%
LYFT INC0.08%0.61%
URBAN OUTFITTERS0.07%0.40%
KONTOOR BRANDS INC0.07%0.25%
DAVE INC0.07%0.43%
SPHERE ENTERTAINMENT CO0.06%0.52%
CHEESECAKE FACTORY (THE)0.05%0.21%
AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS INC0.00%0.12%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCGOnly in IJT
NVIDIA CORP 14.62%FormFactor, Inc. 1.38%
APPLE INC 9.64%Viasat, Inc. 1.35%
ALPHABET INC 9.10%Argan, Inc. 1.24%
AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 1.22%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%Krystal Biotech, Inc. 1.08%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%ESCO Technologies, Inc. 1.00%
BROADCOM INC 3.74%Alkermes plc 0.97%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%Everus Construction Group, Inc. 0.94%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FBCG and IJT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
IJT
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityiShares
What it isBlue Chip GrowthS&P Small-Cap 600 Growth
Total return, 1 year+17.3%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.2 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.57%0.18%
Already in the S&P 50086.8%0.0%
Holdings214347

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IJT in plain words

IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 347 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or IJT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and IJT returned +17.6%, so IJT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or IJT?
FBCG charges 0.57% a year and IJT charges 0.18%, so IJT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and IJT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 0% of IJT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against IJT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against IJT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-IJT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources