Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or IGSB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and IGSB returned +1.7%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FBCG or IGSB?

FBCG charges 0.57% a year and IGSB charges 0.04%, so IGSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs IGSB: how they differ

FBCG and IGSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and IGSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCG	Only in IGSB
NVIDIA CORP 14.62%	EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL 0.31%
APPLE INC 9.64%	T-MOBILE USA INC 0.18%
ALPHABET INC 9.10%	BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.16%
AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%	ABBVIE INC 0.14%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%	AMAZON.COM INC 0.13%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%	CVS HEALTH CORP 0.13%
BROADCOM INC 3.74%	BOEING CO 0.12%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%	MARS INC 0.12%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FBCG and IGSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	IGSB iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Fidelity	iShares
What it is	Blue Chip Growth	1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+17.3%	+1.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.2 pts	−15.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.57%	0.04%
Holdings	214	4606

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IGSB in plain words

IGSB is a bond fund tracking the 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or IGSB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and IGSB returned +1.7%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or IGSB?: FBCG charges 0.57% a year and IGSB charges 0.04%, so IGSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against IGSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against IGSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-IGSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources