Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FBCG vs GDX: how they differ
Over the year GDX returned more, +40.2% against +17.3%, and GDX charges 0.51% against 0.57%.
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and VanEck Gold Miners ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and GDX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FBCG | GDX |
|---|---|---|
| IAMGOLD CORP | 0.09% | 1.38% |
| AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD | 0.08% | 10.67% |
| Only in FBCG | Only in GDX |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 14.62% | Newmont Corp 10.42% |
| APPLE INC 9.64% | Barrick Mining Corp 7.95% |
| ALPHABET INC 9.10% | Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 5.61% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 8.43% | Anglogold Ashanti Plc 5.04% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.20% | Franco-Nevada Corp 4.89% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 3.90% | Kinross Gold Corp 4.40% |
| BROADCOM INC 3.74% | Gold Fields Ltd 4.07% |
| ELI LILLY and CO 2.25% | Pan American Silver Corp 2.98% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Thematic ETF |
| Issuer | Fidelity | VanEck |
| What it is | Blue Chip Growth | Miners and metals |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.3% | +40.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.2 pts | +22.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.51% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.8% | 11.0% |
| Holdings | 214 | 59 |
FBCG in plain words
FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
GDX in plain words
By weight, 11% of GDX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 59 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 22.7 pts. It sits 16.2% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or GDX?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and GDX returned +40.2%, so GDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FBCG or GDX?
- FBCG charges 0.57% a year and GDX charges 0.51%, so GDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FBCG and GDX overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 11% of GDX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
- Are FBCG and GDX the same kind of fund?
- No. FBCG is an index ETF and GDX is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against GDX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-GDX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources