Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs FXI: how they differ

FBCG and FXI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and iShares China Large-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and FXI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCGOnly in FXI
NVIDIA CORP 14.62%Alibaba Group Holding Limited 8.66%
APPLE INC 9.64%CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION 8.25%
ALPHABET INC 9.10%Tencent Holdings Limited 7.72%
AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA 6.02%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%XIAOMI CORPORATION 5.41%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%MEITUAN 4.79%
BROADCOM INC 3.74%Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of Chi 4.41%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%BYD COMPANY LIMITED 4.09%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

FBCG and FXI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityiShares
What it isBlue Chip GrowthChina Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year+17.3%−13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.2 pts−31.3 pts
Expense ratio0.57%0.73%
Already in the S&P 50086.8%0.0%
Holdings21452

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

FXI in plain words

FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 56.6%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or FXI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and FXI returned −13.8%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or FXI?
FBCG charges 0.57% a year and FXI charges 0.73%, so FBCG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and FXI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 0% of FXI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against FXI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against FXI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-FXI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources