Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs FDVV: how they differ

FBCG and FDVV hold 28% of their weight in the same names.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and Fidelity High Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and FDVV hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FBCG and FDVV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFBCGFDVV
NVIDIA CORP14.62%6.86%
APPLE INC9.64%5.70%
MICROSOFT CORP5.20%4.50%
BROADCOM INC3.74%3.50%
ALPHABET INC9.10%2.21%
META PLATFORMS INC3.90%0.74%
STARBUCKS CORP0.61%1.66%
ELI LILLY and CO2.25%0.56%
LOWES COS INC0.48%1.38%
ABBVIE INC0.42%0.40%
TJX COMPANIES INC0.39%1.65%
GE AEROSPACE0.40%0.34%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCGOnly in FDVV
AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58%
NETFLIX INC 2.23%COCA COLA CO 1.85%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 2.03%BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.78%
TESLA INC 1.45%ALTRIA GROUP INC 1.70%
APPLOVIN CORP 1.26%PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 1.64%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 1.19%MCDONALDS CORP 1.55%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.12%WELLS FARGO and CO 1.52%
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC 1.03%NEXTERA ENERGY INC 1.39%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

FBCG and FDVV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityFidelity
What it isBlue Chip GrowthHigh Dividend
Total return, 1 year+17.3%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.2 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.57%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50086.8%86.7%
Holdings21496

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or FDVV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and FDVV returned +17.2%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or FDVV?
FBCG charges 0.57% a year and FDVV charges 0.15%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and FDVV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 87% of FDVV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 28% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against FDVV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against FDVV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-FDVV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources