Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EWY vs IXUS: how they differ

EWY and IXUS hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and EWY returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and IXUS hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions EWY and IXUS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingEWYIXUS
SK hynix Inc.31.02%1.15%
SK Square Co., Ltd.3.10%0.13%
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY2.45%0.11%
DOOSAN ENERBILITY CO., LTD.1.22%0.09%
KB Financial Group Inc.1.40%0.09%
HANWHA AEROSPACE CO., LTD.1.02%0.08%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS CO.,LTD3.44%0.08%
SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.1.15%0.07%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP CO.,LTD1.04%0.07%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.0.07%0.20%
Hana Financial Group Inc.0.84%0.06%
KIA CORPORATION1.02%0.06%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EWYOnly in IXUS
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.04%
ASML Holding N.V. 1.32%
Tencent Holdings Limited 0.91%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.75%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.69%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited 0.67%
Novartis AG 0.66%
Nestle S.A. 0.61%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

EWY and IXUS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isMSCI South KoreaCore MSCI Total International Stock
Total return, 1 year+147.9%+22.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+130.4 pts+4.7 pts
Expense ratio0.59%0.07%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings824185

EWY in plain words

EWY is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +147.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 82 positions, with the top ten at 70.0%. It sat 13.9% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IXUS in plain words

IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4185 positions, with the top ten at 12.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or IXUS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +147.9% and IXUS returned +22.2%, so EWY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EWY or IXUS?
EWY charges 0.59% a year and IXUS charges 0.07%, so IXUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWY and IXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWY and 0% of IXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EWY against IXUS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWY against IXUS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EWY-IXUS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources