Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EWT vs XLF: how they differ
EWT and XLF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EWT and XLF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EWT | Only in XLF |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 19.35% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 12.10% |
| MediaTek Inc. 7.56% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 11.57% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 5.64% | Visa Inc 7.51% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 4.09% | Mastercard Inc 5.47% |
| ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. 2.86% | Bank of America Corp 4.91% |
| ELITE MATERIAL CO., LTD. 2.75% | Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 3.94% |
| UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY CORP. 2.73% | Wells Fargo & Co 3.34% |
| United Microelectronics Corporation 2.25% | Morgan Stanley 3.31% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | XLF State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | MSCI Taiwan | Financials |
| Total return, 1 year | +84.9% | +7.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +67.4 pts | −9.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 85 | 76 |
EWT in plain words
EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 85 positions, with the top ten at 51.6%.
XLF in plain words
XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EWT or XLF?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and XLF returned +7.6%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EWT or XLF?
- EWT charges 0.59% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so XLF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EWT and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWT and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWT against XLF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EWT-XLF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources