Which returned more over the last year, EWT or PDBC?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and PDBC returned +55.2%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EWT or PDBC?

EWT charges 0.59% a year and PDBC charges 0.59%, so EWT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EWT vs PDBC: how they differ

EWT and PDBC are both equity index funds, and over the year EWT returned more, +84.9% against +55.2%.

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

EWT and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF	PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Invesco
What it is	MSCI Taiwan	Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy
Total return, 1 year	+84.9%	+55.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+67.4 pts	+37.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.59%	0.59%
Holdings	85	not filed

EWT in plain words

EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 85 positions, with the top ten at 51.6%.

PDBC in plain words

PDBC is an index equity fund tracking the Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWT or PDBC?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and PDBC returned +55.2%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EWT or PDBC?: EWT charges 0.59% a year and PDBC charges 0.59%, so EWT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EWT against PDBC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWT against PDBC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EWT-PDBC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources